Discrepancies related to Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Financing of Terrorism (AML and CFT) regulations were observed against brokers and depository participants by two exchanges -- BSE and NSE -- as also depositories -- CSDL and NSDL, as per market regulator Sebi's latest annual report.
A total of 380 members faced actions last fiscal for discrepancies related to AML/CFT rules as against 375 such entities in 2013-14.
Of the total market intermediaries, the BSE took action against 166 trading members, NSE dealt with 27 entities, while MSEI took steps against nine members after observing violations of anti-money laundering norms.
The actions taken by the exchanges and depositories were by way of warnings, advice and imposition of penalties.
More From This Section
While warnings and advice were issued to a majority of the market entities, as many as 32 were slapped with penalties for violating AMT and CFT norms, while warnings and advice were issued to a majority.
Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), had carried out 59 special purpose inspections against stock brokers to check their compliance with the AML/CFT and Know-Your-Client (KYC) norms, during 2014-15.
Money laundering is considered one of the serious issues facing the financial systems around the world.
"Combined with the financing of terrorist activities, the issue of money laundering has been at the heart of regulations worldwide to ensure transparent, fair and smooth financial markets," Sebi said in the report.
The regulator also noted that intermediaries were permitted to depend on third parties for carrying out due diligence of their clients.
The committee has recommended wide-ranging reforms to
help unlock diverse domestic sources of capital such as domestic pension funds, insurance companies and charitable endowments.
It has also susggested for making safe-harbour effective for managing funds from India. To attract foreign capital by having fund managers based in India, it is important that their operations in India are not treated as permanent establishments under Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs), the committee has suggested.
Currently most fund managers of offshore funds manage their investments from offshore locations rather than from India. This is a disadvantage to both them and India.
"In order to sustain the continued growth of the AIF industry, the path ahead requires reforms in the enabling regulatory framework for AIFs," the panel noted.