The government, while opposing any stay on implementation of the Aadhaar scheme, said that around 115.15 crore people have already enrolled for Aadhaar card, which is a citizen's right to identity, and there was no need for considering any interim stay on the scheme.
"Moreover, the Aadhaar Act, 2016 is a legislation of socio-economic reform and this court has held that courts must show judicial restraint in dealing with such legislations," the government said in its counter affidavit filed in response to several petitions opposing the scheme.
"The Aadhaar number issued to the residents under the Aadhaar Act, 2016 enforces the right to identity and is instrumental in fulfilment of several fundamental rights of the teeming masses in this country flowing from Article 21 viz. The right to food, the right to livelihood etc," the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) said in its affidavit filed in the apex court.
It said, "The uniqueness of Aadhaar helps in elimination of duplicates and fakes from any beneficiary database leading to immense savings through reduction of leakages and wastages."
Also Read
The Centre said that in 2014-16, the government's savings through Direct Benefit Transfer Scheme on account of Aadhaar was Rs 49,560 crore.
It said with almost the entire population having been covered by Aadhaar, the petitioners' apprehensions of so called "large-scale exclusion" of the people from government subsidies or benefits due to lack of Aadhaar card was misplaced, self-contradictory and unfounded.
"The notifications thus ensure that no genuine person is denied of any benefits because of lack of Aadhaar. Therefore, petitioners' contentions of urgency in this matter is incorrect and unfounded," it said.
The UIDAI also said when Aadhaar has been adopted by several statutes and authorities in pursuant to directions by the apex court and as per the legislative amendments by Parliament, the court ought not to entertain the applications seeking interim stay of notifications passed in pursuance to the Aadhaar Act 2016, as it would stall and interfere with the governance.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content