Yadav said the demands to amend the sections governing the appointment and removal of the Lokpal would be wrong to be attributed to Anna alone as these were the basic demands of the Janlokpal movement.
"Now that they have been caught red handed in an act of daylight robbery they need a fig leaf. So they are discovering certain things by going to Anna which we have been saying. It's a damage control exercise because they thought they would get away," Yadav told PTI here.
"What the Supreme Court said during the NJAC debate was that you cannot leave the category vague by saying eminent person but should put certain criteria. And the argument is completely rubbish as the word eminent persons was not used in the 2014 Bill or the IAC draft," he said.
He said if the government adopts the 2014 draft, Swaraj Abhiyan, a forum launched by him and Prashant Bhushan, would come to its defence and launch agitation against the Centre if obstacles are put.
Also Read
The 2014 Bill had provisions to act against officials of the MCD, DDA, Delhi Police which Swaraj Abhiyan "accepts" but bringing Union Ministries under its ambit would be "ridiculous", Yadav said, adding "someone should have a sense of the Constitution".
Under fire for tabling a "diluted" Bill, the Delhi government is likely to amend the draft Janlokpal legislation and will introduce two changes in the appointment and removal clauses as per Anna's suggestions.
On a case against rebel AAP MLA Pankaj Pushkar, who have sided with Swaraj Abhiyan, being referred to the privilege committee of the Delhi Assembly, Yadav said, "This is astonishing as you know he (Pushkar) is the one who lodged a complaint and has been in the receiving end of threats and abuses.