A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Chander Shekhar was informed by the Commission that the MLAs were now taking a "vague defence" that they wished to adduce evidence in their support but had failed to do so when they were afforded the opportunity.
The poll panel submitted that the legislators had "willfully and deliberately" abstained from participating in the proceedings before the poll panel.
The ECI said it afforded the MLAs ample opportunity to come and participate in several hearings, which clearly demonstrated and proved that the principles of natural justice have been duly complied with and adhered to.
"However, it's a matter of fact that the MLAs herein gave only illusory responses, the ECI's counsel Amit Sharma contended.
More From This Section
The counsel was responding to the claim of the AAP MLAs that they were held guilty of holding office-of-profit by the ECI without giving them an opportunity to explain their stand and flouted the principles of natural justice.
"Thus, it is clear that the aforesaid statement made by the Chief Minister of Delhi was nothing but an attempt to malign the image of the said Election Commissioner and ensure his recusal from the proceedings, and to obfuscate the issues much less, to cause obstruction and delay in the proceedings, which ultimately would frustrate or obstruct the course of justice," the ECI's counsel submitted.
The arguments on behalf of the ECI, which remained inconclusive, will resume on February 26.
The high court had on January 24 refused to stay the Centre's notification disqualifying them, but restrained the EC from taking any "precipitate measures" such as announcing dates for by polls to fill the vacancies. The EC had recommended the disqualification of 20 AAP MLAs on January 19. The President had accepted the EC's opinion the very next day.