Accused should explain death if he was alone with victim: HC

Bs_logoImage
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jul 19 2015 | 2:57 PM IST
Observing that the onus is on the accused to explain how a person sustained injuries and died if the two were alone at the time of an incident, the Bombay High Court has upheld conviction of a man for murdering his wife.
A division bench of justices V K Tahilramani and Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi dismissed the appeal filed by 32-year-old Uttareshwar Ramchandra Devkar, challenging a sessions court order of January 2010 convicting and sentencing him to life imprisonment for the murder of his wife Vandana.
According to the prosecution, Pune resident Devkar and his wife were married for over 10 years and had a daughter. The couple had frequent quarrels over Devkar's alleged illicit relations with several women.
Vandana had complained to her brothers about her husband's illicit relations. Her brothers had admonished Devkar and warned him not to continue with such behaviour. However, when there was no change in him, Vandana returned to her matrimonial home. Devkar apologised to her and assured her that he would end all his relations following which Vandana returned.
On June 10, 2009, the accused murdered Vandana by smothering her with a towel. He then took Vandana to her matrimonial house in a rickshaw and claimed that she fell off the cot and lost consciousness. Vandana was then rushed to hospital where she was declared dead.
The doctor, who conducted the postmortem, opined that the death of Vandana was due to asphyxiation caused by smothering. Following this, FIR was lodged and Devkar was arrested.
The court, after perusing the evidence, observed that there is no merit in the appeal filed by Devkar.
"The present case is based on circumstantial evidence. The accused had motive and was with the deceased alone in the house. In such a situation the onus is on the accused to explain how the deceased sustained injuries and died," the court said.
"We find that there is sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant committed murder of his wife Vandana," the court said recently while upholding Devkar's conviction.

You’ve reached your limit of 5 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Access to Exclusive Premium Stories

  • Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 19 2015 | 2:57 PM IST