Dismissing the actor's bail application, Justice Sunil Thomas said that the investigation in the case is still at a crucial stage.
"The case is unique, considering the seriousness, meticulous planning, cruel nature of execution and being a crime executed to wreak vengeance ona woman by engaging criminals, to sexually abuse her. Courts have to be circumspect in granting bail in such cases", the court said.
It also said that the memory card is a potential threat to the life of the victim and there was every possibility of any of the accused attempting to interfere in the investigation.
"The petitioner (Dileep) is also involved in distribution and production of films and is also an owner of a theatre. Definitely he must be wielding considerable command on the industry," the court said.
Also Read
"Prima facie there are materials to suspect the involvement of the actor in the crime," the judge said.
The actor, arrested on July 10, had moved the High Court for bail after a magisterial court at nearby Angamaly declined to grant him relief and sent him to judicial custody till July 25.
Dileep was charged under various sections of the IPC, including one for hatching a criminal conspiracy for abduction and assault of the actress in a moving car on February 17.
In their remand application, the police had claimed that Dileep had developed a grudge against the actress for letting his former wife know about his alleged affairs and had hatched a conspiracy to take revenge way back in 2013.
The Director General of Prosecution had claimed that the evidence gathered by the investigation agency had established that Dileep was the "kingpin" in the crime.
A "quotation" was given to execute a crime and such a case was reported for the first time in the state, the prosecution had said.
Six persons, including'Pulsar' Suni, have so far been arrested in connection with the incident.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content