Agarwal had filed the suit claiming the firm violated the agreement. She maintained that the firm had no right to use the advertisement materials of 2008 in subsequent years without her consent.
Her claim was opposed by the firm which contended that there was absolutely no violation. The actress had sought a permanent injunction against the advertisement commercial and damages.
A division bench of justices Rajiv Shakder and N Sathishkumar granted interim injunction till the disposal of the 'original side appeal' restraining the firm from using the profile of the actress.
"In spite of notice given to respondent he had not chosen to appear. Interim injunction granted till disposal of original side appeal," the bench said.
Apart from seeking to set aside the single judge order, Agarwal also sought an interim injunction restraining the firm from using her profile for business advertisements in any manner whether it may be through pamphlets or any kind of business promotion or cinematography materials.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content