Additional Sessions Judge Yogesh Khanna also said the advocate was entitled to get benefit of doubt since nothing incriminating had surfaced against him during trial.
"Since, prosecutrixes have completely resiled from their earlier statements given to police and had denied the incident of rape by the accused or that accused ever indulged in sexual intercourse with them on any false promise of marriage...," the judge said.
The police said the advocate, who represented one of the women in her matrimonial disputes with her first husband, established sexual relations with her in 2011 on the pretext of marriage.
On enquiry, the other woman, who was allegedly his colleague at a law firm, revealed that she was in a physical relation with him from past four years, the police had said.
Also Read
After the two felt that they have been cheated and raped by the advocate on false promise of marriage, they decided to file criminal case, police said. Two separate rape cases had been lodged against the advocate.
The women, however, changed their statements during the trial and denied of being raped by the advocate.