It's also a win for the company that will host President Donald Trump at its North Charleston facilities tomorrow.
Nearly 3,000 workers were eligible to vote yesterday on representation by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace workers.
According to Boeing, nearly 74 per cent of the more than 2,800 votes cast were against representation.
It was a massive victory for union opponents, in line with longstanding Southern aversion to collective bargaining. At 1.6 per cent, South Carolina maintains the lowest percentage of unionized workers in the country, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Also Read
Other largescale Southern unionization efforts haven't met recent success.
In 2014, Volkswagen workers in Chattanooga, Tennessee, turned down representation by the United Autoworkers. For years, organizers have campaigned for representation among Nissan workers in Canton, Mississippi, but no vote has been scheduled.
Boeing came to South Carolina in part because of the state's minuscule union presence.
"I think a failed vote isn't that big of a deal because that's frankly the norm in the South," said Jeffrey Hirsch, law professor who specializes in labor relations at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Had the results at Boeing been reversed, Hirsch says, the ripple effect could have been dramatic. Politicians such as former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley -- who, directly and via her labor secretary Catherine Templeton, adamantly spoke against the need for unions here -- would be forced to rethink business recruitment strategies, and corporations also might think more carefully about locating in South Carolina.
"We'll make the unions understand full well that they are not needed, not wanted and not welcome in the state of South Carolina," Haley said in a 2012 address. She has since been appointed ambassador to the United Nations by President Donald Trump.
Union opposition in this heavily Republican state is tied to politics, given Democrats' longstanding ties to organized labor. Any lenience toward unions could be seen as giving Democrats a toehold in the state, where both legislative chambers and the governor's office have long been controlled by Republicans.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content