The faction led by Sasikala made it clear that there cannot be riders for talks, with some loyalists asserting the two leaders would continue to be at the helm of the party.
Cooperation Minister Sellur K Raju said it would not be fair to put conditions for the merger talks, while several die-hard loyalists of the Sasikala group went to the extent of questioning the mandate of Ministers who were taking forward the merger proposal, indicating it did not have the approval of the party leadership.
Adding to the suspense, Dhinakaran, who returned to the city early this morning from Bengaluru, is yet to express his view publicly on the talks for merger or the meeting held by the Ministers late last night.
Dhinkaran was apprised of the developments at his house here by senior Ministers K A Sengottaiyan and Dindigul C Srinivasan.
Also Read
Panneerselvam made it clear that his group's "basic principle" of keeping the party and the government free from the "clutches" of a single family cannot be compromised.
His assertion came after last night's confabulations, including the one attended by several senior Tamil Nadu ministers, after which they had appeared inclined to end the face-off with the Panneerselvam camp.
An otherwise unassuming Panneerselvam had revolted against AIADMK General Secretary V K Sasikala in February last, alleging he was forced by her to resign as Chief Minister following party supremo J Jayalalithaa's death.
Panneerselvam, a staunch Jayalalithaa loyalist, had filled in for her thrice--twice during her incarceration in corruption cases, and once when she lay on her death bed.
It was Panneerselvam who had first sent out signals of a possible rapprochement between the rival factions, a move which was promptly welcomed by the Sasikala camp followers.
Sources in the Panneerselvam camp today said there was no likelihood of talks commencing till their key demand for ejecting Sasikala and her nephew Dhinakaran, the AIADMK Deputy General Secretary, was met.
In an indication that the merger proposal may be stillborn, Sasikala loyalists want both her and Dhinakaran to continue in their respective posts.
Party strongman from North Chennai P Vetrivel sought to downplay the importance of last night's parleys, saying it was "not a proper party meet" and there was "nothing official" about it.
Noting that Dhinakaran was away in Bengaluru yesterday, he wanted to know how the meeting could have had his nod.
"Ministers can meet, but how many district secretaries and party functionaries participated?" he asked, while speaking to journalists.
Andipatti MLA Thanga Tamilselvan said, "Sasikala will be the general secretary and Dhinakaran will be deputy general secretary. This is the desire of 1.5 crore party workers."
He said there could be no pre-condition for talks. "No teams have been set up to hold talks," he claimed.
Incidentally, Chief Minister Palaniswami did not attend any of the parleys where members of his ministry discussed the possibility of a merger.
Earlier in the day, AIADMK MLAs from the rival factions held informal meetings, though what transpired was not known.
Speculations have swirled in the state's political circles about a possible pact between Palaniswami and Panneerselvam under which both Sasikala and Dhinakaran could be dumped.
Unconfirmed reports had it that under the arrangement Palaniswami would continue as Chief Minister while Panneerselvam would occupy the coveted post of AIADMK general secretary, which was held by J Jayalalithaa till her death.
Incidentally, the talk of a possible rapprochement between the bitterly divided party factions began yesterday, hours after the Delhi Police booked Dhinakaran for allegedly trying to bribe an Election Commission official in a bid to obtain the coveted "two-leaves" party symbol for his faction.
Dhinakaran also faces two FERA violation cases.
There was reportedly disquiet in Tamil Nadu's ruling party ever since Income Tax officials raided Health Minister Vijayabaskar's premises and seized evidence of bribing voters for the bypoll to R K Nagar assembly seat.
The poll, scheduled for April 12, was countermanded by the Election Commission on April 9 amid allegations of rampant inducement and bribing of voters.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content