Responding to Shehzad Poonawala's "dynastic politics" remark on the organisational poll which, he claimed, was "rigged", Aiyar said today the Congress leader from Maharashtra was free to contest against Gandhi, while there was no election during the Mughal rule when sons succeeded the emperors.
"When Shah Jahan came in the place of Jahangir, was there an election? When Aurangzeb came in place of Shah Jahan, was there an election? No. It was known to everyone earlier that the throne of the emperor will automatically go to the king's heir. If they fight amongst themselves, it is a different matter.
Aiyar said Rahul Gandhi was being elevated as everyone liked him.
Latching on to his remarks, likened the imminent elevation of Rahul Gandhi to dynastic succession of Mughal rulers.
More From This Section
"Mani Shanker Aiyar, who was a minister in the Congress government said 'did elections happen during Mughal rule? After Jahangir, Shahjahan came, was any election held? After Shahjahan it was understood that Aurangzeb would be the leader'.
Aiyar later said he was, in fact, contrasting the dynastic succession with elections today.
"I was contrasting dynastic succession under the Mughals where only sons could succeed. With the election process at 24, Akbar Road, any Congressman or woman was entitled to stand against Rahul Gandhi," he said.