Appearing on behalf of Modi, Additional Solicitor General of India Satya Pal Jain submitted that the allegations levelled by the petitioner Ajay Rai "lacked critical and material facts" and hence the election petition deserved to be "dismissed in limine".
Jain contended that Rai, a Congress MLA who had contested from Varanasi in the Lok Sabha polls, had failed to prove "that there was anything in Modi's election which violated provisions of the Representation of People Act or the Constitution" and hence his petition was "not maintainable".
However, it was requested by one of Rai's advocates Jitendra Kumar that the lead counsel Umesh Narain Sharma was "unwell and out of station for medical treatment" and hence time be granted so that the petitioner's side could reply to the arguments placed forward by the respondent.
The court, therefore, fixed September 30 as the next date of hearing in the matter.
More From This Section
Rai finished a distant third and ended up forfeiting his deposit.
Modi went on to retain Varanasi, giving up Vadodara in his home state of Gujarat where he had achieved an even bigger victory - by a margin of 5.7 lakh votes.
Interestingly, Rai had began his political career in the 1990s as a BJP MLA from Kolasla constituency in Varanasi district. He broke away in 2009 when the party refused to give him a ticket for the Lok Sabha polls.