Amended CrPC provision will hinder police functioning: HC told

Bs_logoImage
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 21 2016 | 5:42 PM IST
The change in law providing for prosecution of public servants without sanction in cases of alleged offences against women, would allow wrongdoers to make false allegations against cops, hindering their ability to do their job, police today told Delhi High Court.
The law and order agency has contended that the change in the criminal procedure law "is an impediment to free and fair investigation and for discharging official duties" and was "open to gross misuse in the absence of any safeguards".
Delhi Police made the submission before a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, which was hearing a PIL by a serving official challenging the amended provision in Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
"The amendment exposes any investigating agency and its officers to prosecution in all cases of the nature contemplated therein, is grossly arbitrary, unfair and unreasonable.
"No police officer or any other public servant (in his investigative capacity) would be able to perform his duty in the field, if the explanation to section 197 CrPC is allowed to stand," the police said in an affidavit placed before the bench, which will hear the matter on November 24.
Section 197 of CrPC provides that prosecution of a public servant requires sanction from the appropriate authority, but the explanation added to the provision by the amendment of 2013 says that this protection would not be available to a public servant in cases of any alleged offences against women.
The affidavit states that "removal of requirement of sanction does not only fetter police powers and expose public servants to unwarranted and/or malicious prosecution, but also removes an important defence available to police officers in the event they are accused of an offence in the performance of their lawful duties".
Inspector Anil Sharma, in his plea, has sought quashing of the amendment, saying "it defeats the purpose and object of Section 197 CrPC and is in complete violation and against the scheme an spirit of CrPC 1973 and the Constitution".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

You’ve reached your limit of 10 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 21 2016 | 5:42 PM IST