While the bureaucrats feel it will help overcome the "policy paralysis", legal experts have questioned the move to provide a blanket protection from criminal action without sanction from competent authority.
"A criminal is a criminal" even if he retires or resigns and the amendment could have been made more realistic and deterrent for those taking the system for a ride, was the view of those who were critical of the Cabinet's approval to the amendment in the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Sanjay Bhoosreddy, Secretary of Central IAS Association, differed with the view of legal experts on the issue of sanction, saying such a step was necessary to do away with "policy paralysis" in the administration.
However, legal experts like retired judges S N Dhingra and R S Sodhi and senior lawyer Anil Divan expressed reservations over shielding of bureaucrats even after retirement saying the entire proposal does not seem to be on the right path.
Also Read
"We are all professionals and especially those doing their work honestly need to be protected. If we have to do away with the policy paralysis and if we want the bureaucrat or the highest decision making authority to take decisions in the right direction, then system has to provide appropriate environment to ensure investment in nation building," he said.
The IAS officer did not have any complains on the proposal to enhance the punishment for corrupt bureaucrats and said, "We would like the government to go after the corrupt elements in the system and nip them in the bud."