A bench of Chief Justice N V Ramana and Justice Manmohan today sought more details from the petitioner about the matter and listed it on December 9 for further hearing.
The bench asked the petitioner, advocate M L Sharma, to give details about the Supreme Court verdict dismissing a plea of the Centre seeking a review of the apex court's judgement debarring arrested persons from contesting polls.
The apex court, on November 19, 2013, had dismissed the review petition of the Centre saying it is not necessary to look into the issue in view of the amendment in law by Parliament.
The apex court, however, had said the issue of constitutional validity of the amendment will be considered separately after an NGO Lok Prahri opposed the Centre's petition and said it has challenged the amendment in Representation of People Act in this regard.
More From This Section
Sharma in his PIL before the high court has challenged the September 29, 2013 amendment in the Representation of People Act by the government.
The amendment in the Act enables arrested persons to contests elections as a person does not cease to be an elector only by reason of his being in police custody or in imprisonment.