Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

An acquittal should be an order of simple acquittal:HC

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Dec 25 2014 | 5:35 PM IST
Setting aside a Magistrate court finding, the Madras High Court has made it clear that an acquittal shall be an order of simple acquittal of an accused in a criminal case where there is no evidence against him and trial courts shall not employ expressions such as "not proved beyond reasonable doubt."
A perusal of the judgment of the trial court would go to show that no one has spoken anything incriminating about the accused. Therefore, the trial court should have acquitted him by recording an order of acquittal without adding any adjectives such as 'not proved beyond reasonable doubt' or 'by giving the benefit of doubt,' Justice S.Nagamuthu said.
"The trial court should have acquitted the accused simpliciter without adding any qualification to the word 'acquittal,' the judge said.
Justice Nagamuthu was setting aside the finding recorded by the Judicial Magistrate II of Panrutti in which he had acquitted one E.Kalivarathan saying Kalivarathan was acquitted because the charges against him have not been proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Kalivarathan was an accused in a criminal case with eight accused whereas no witnesses implicated him in any manner with the alleged crime in the case. The Magistrate acquitted all the accused including Kalivarathan giving benefit of doubt.
When Kalivarathan applied for the post of Grade II constable the recruitment board rejected his candidature on the ground that the acquittal was not a 'honourable acquittal.'
Hence Kalivarathan filed a criminal revision petition to convert the acquittal as an honourable acquittal.

More From This Section

"If there are findings in the order or judgment of acquittal, which are adverse to the interest of the accused, as an aggrieved person, he should have the remedy to get the adverse findings set aside.If the accused does not get this finding expunged, he may have to carry the stigma about his character throughout his life. This would certainly result in civil consequence as it relates to his moral character."
The judge rejected the contention of the Additional Public Prosecutor that an acquitted person does not have a right of appeal.
"Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure paves the way for an acquitted person to challenge the adverse remarks made against him,and the adverse findings made against him in the order of acquittal," the judge said.

Also Read

First Published: Dec 25 2014 | 5:35 PM IST

Next Story