The submission was made before Justice Manmohan by Delhi government which said it was "handicapped" in taking action against app-based cab companies since the taxis operated by them carried no marks identifying for whom they worked.
Delhi government's additional standing counsel Naushad Ahmed Khan also told the court that when the drivers are questioned, they claim to have All India Taxi Permits (AITPs).
"We are totally handicapped in taking action against them (app-based cab companies). Vehicles are not identified. If you check with driver, he will deny working for them and we cannot always check with the passengers.
He also said Delhi government would be filing a contempt petition against the app-based cab companies for violating court orders.
Also Read
Meanwhile, an Association of Radio Taxi Operators alleged that while Ola was claiming it was not using diesel cabs, such vehicles were being used by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Taxi for Sure. "Entire fleet of Ola has been diverted to Taxi for Sure," senior advocate Nidhesh Gupta, appearing for the association, said.
The court observed the misuse could be by a customer or driver and told Ola to check whether this was happening and, if yes, how it intended to deal with it.
It also suggested to Ola to consider sharing an order placed by a customer with the police or transport department in real time so the authorities can curb misuse of the app.
Recently, the association had told a division bench of the high court that its order upholding a ban on diesel cabs providing point-to-point service in the city was being implemented only against Ola while other app-based taxi services were violating it with impunity.