The commission rejected the RBI's arrangement in which an applicant was supposed to address his application to the specific department which might have been holding that information.
Activist Subhash Agrawal had sought information about printing of Re one note, which was returned saying it was not addressed to the right Central Public Information Officer (CPIO).
Under the Right to Information Act, public authorities can depute multiple officers to handle RTI requests. The Act asks these officers to provide information to the applicants.
Agrawal approached the CIC with a prayer seeking direction to the RBI to nominate a nodal CPIO so that even if an RTI application is not addressed to the CPIO of a particular department of the respondents, it is directed by the nodal CPIO to the concerned department(s) and is not returned to the RTI applicant.
Also Read
"We do not agree with the current practice of the respondents that all the RTI applications should be filed to the CPIOs of their specific departments, information concerning whom is available on their website," Information Commissioner Sharat Sabharwal said.
"In any case, a public authority should not return an RTI application merely on the grounds that it is not addressed to a specific CPIO but only to 'CPIO'," he said.
Sabharwal directed the RBI to appoint a nodal CPIO or designate one of the existing CPIOs as the nodal CPIO and give wide publicity to his name, designation and address.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content