The court said the 22-year-old woman, mother of a nine- year-old boy, was well educated and it cannot be said that she was incapable of understanding the nature and implications of the acts which she consented to.
"Her consent to physical relations, if any, was an act of conscious reason. Where was the compulsion for her to establish physical relations first without ensuring that the accused was willing to perform marriage with her after getting divorce from his wife? Even she was not legally divorced in October 2014.
The court discharged the man, saying the material placed before it do not disclose the grave suspicion against the accused for framing a charge against him for the alleged offences of rape and criminal intimidation under the IPC.
The judge said court cannot act merely as a post office or mouthpiece of the prosecution but has to consider the broad probabilities of the case.
Also Read
She alleged that he lured her for marriage and pretended to be extra concerned about her.
She further alleged that initially he established physical relations with her forcibly and in January this year, he suddenly disappeared after which the woman lodged a complaint against the man at Dwarka South Police Station.
The court, in its order, said their relationship continued for sufficient duration and at no stage, she raised alarm or hue and cry or lodged report with the police against alleged forcible sex.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content