The court directed the Centre to make copies and return "forthwith" by Friday all seized private letters, files and documents to the former CM, Ministers and parliamentary secretaries and are in the custody of the Administrator through the Chief Secretary.
"After hearing counsel for parties at some length, we are of the view that certain records/documents deserve to be furnished to the former Chief Minister, ministers and parliamentary secretaries whose offices have been sealed and from whose offices files/documents have been kept in safe custody," a five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice J S Khehar said.
Further, it said the Centre would furnish the copies of the hard disks of computers, laptops seized from them.
After the bench did not accept the contention of Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi that the request by Tuki and other Congress leaders were not genuine, he agreed to its suggestions to provide copies of the documents.
Also Read
"How can you say you will have the sword and he will not have it," the bench remarked,
Rohatgi submitted that Tuki's colleagues filed the petition and never protested that they were handicapped in the absence of the copies of the letters exchanged between Governor Jyoti Prasad Rajkhowa and the then Chief Minister.
The arguments seeking copies of letters addressed between Tuki and Governor and return of files/documents, personal computers and laptops etc provided by the state to CM and ministers, were led by senior advocate Fali S Nariman who said there was a need for interim injunction to retore "status quo ante", otherwise the entire exercise would be futile.
"He (Governor) has passed an order and taken immediate steps to dismiss the CM, his council of ministers and parliamentary secretaries making it impossible to maintain status quo ante at the end of the two months if Parliament do not affirm the promulgation," he submitted.
The noted jurist along with other senior advocates like Kapil Sibal, Rajeev Dhavan and Vivek Tankha said there were 100 letters exchanged between the then CM and the Governor and though they do not reflect happy notes and were acrimonious, they will answer the questions raised by the Centre in its response to the petitions challenging the imposition of central rule in the state on January 26.
"I have no trust on Governor but have trust in Attorney General," Nariman submitted.
The arguments by Nariman in a high pitch evoked reactions from the bench more than once and one such remark was "little anger and aggression is getting too much".
The senior advocate said "there was a need for interim interlocutory urgent order" as all political appointments stood cancelled in the state and all of them (CM, ministers etc) are painted "as if they are criminals".