ATS Counsel Raja Thackeray opposed the PIL saying that already 192 witnesses had been examined in this case and the trial had reached a fag end. Staying the trial at this stage would not serve any purpose, he argued.
The bench headed by Justice P V Hardas then adjourned the PIL, filed by journalist Ashish Khaitan, for hearing on October 7.
The PIL alleged that in the July 11 Mumbai local train blasts of 2006, "The ATS had deliberately created bogus evidence, extracted false confessions from accused by the most inhuman torture, planted explosives in the houses of the accused and implicated innocent Muslim youth."
It has sought a direction to NIA to re-investigate the train blasts pending which the 13 arrested accused should be released on bail and trial against them should be stayed.
More From This Section
"Different wings of the Maharashtra police have presented different versions at different times about the 7/11 train bombings," the PIL stated.
It said that even in the 2006 Malegaon blasts, the Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) arrested several Muslims which now National Investigation Agency (NIA), claims is the handiwork of Hindutva extremists.