In the 'development-versus-development' debate, she says there is a "huge difference" between the models pursued by her and Modi because of circumstances.
"Let me answer your question directly. Did Mr A, or Mr B, have the Junglemahal (naxal) problem to resolve? We have brought peace there. Did Mr A or Mr B have the Darjeeling-like problem to resolve? Darjeeling is now smiling. Did Mr A or Mr B inherit a debt burden for his state of over Rs 2 lakh crore," she told PTI in an interview.
She was responding when asked if she sees a difference between the models of development being pursued by Modi and her own.
Seeking to justify how her model of development was better, the Trinamool Congress leader said, "Let me talk facts and show how the two states (West Bengal and Gujarat) cannot be compared."
More From This Section
She suggested that Gujarat has had sustained development without facing any problems while West Bengal "had to rise from bottom upwards" as it had been "ruined for over 34 years by the Communists".
"This was the story of West Bengal when my government took over. Other states have had sustained development for many decades," she contended.