The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) in its communication to the apex court said there were "some issues" with the name of Pillai, who was the union home secretary from 2009 to 2011.
"We have perused the communication dated August 10 of the Ministry of Home Affairs, Department of Border Management, Government of India which has been placed before the court in a sealed cover by the Solicitor General.
The apex court was hearing a matter relating to the fencing of the Indo-Bangla border.
On July 31, the apex court had constituted a committee comprising Pillai, former Director General of Border Security Force D K Pathak and former professor of Gauhati University Abdul Mannan, subject to their consent.
Also Read
The bench, after perusing the report of ministry, had passed the order.
Meanwhile, the apex court also issued contempt notice to one petitioner Abhijeet Sharma, who has filed petition in the name of NGO Assam Public Works, saying he has held a press conference in the state which "prima-facie amounts to contempt of court".
The top court initiated the contempt proceedings on its own after perusing the August 30 report of the Assam coordinator for National Registration, Prateek Hajela.
The court asked Solicitor General to assist in the matter related to contempt proceeding.
On July 21, the apex court had deferred constitution of a committee to supervise the border fencing on the Indo-Bangla border till July 31 after the Centre had submitted three names for its consideration.
Earlier, former home secretary Madhukar Gupta had expressed inability to continue supervising the border fencing on the Indo-Bangladesh border due to personal reasons.
The apex court had observed that when it was monitoring the process of preparation and publication of the draft NRC, which is meant to identify original residents of the state to check illegal migration, through a court-appointed committee, no agency or authority can make such a statement.
The bench had then clarified that it would like to give the work to a public spirited person and allowed Centre and petitioners to suggest some names for the committee.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content