Dame Athene Donald, professor of experimental physics at the university and master of Churchill College, said references were often unintentionally written in a "gendered way", with academics more likely to describe female applicants for research posts or fellowships as "hard-working" or "team players", 'The Sunday Times' reported.
She argued that such descriptions failed to communicate how good candidates actually were, unlike superlatives such as "excellent", "driven" or "outstanding", which were often reserved for males.
She feels the language fails to communicate whether a female PhD student is hard-working and conscientious, or that she was outstanding, goes the extra mile and always exceeds your expectations.
"There is an enormous difference in the impact of the two descriptions," she said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content