A bench of Justices G S Sistani and Vinod Goel said this while dismissing the plea of the Chhattisgarh government that the Delhi High Court did not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.
The state government had contended that rejection of mercy plea by the President and the Governor of Chhattisgarh does not give rise to any cause of action.
"Therefore, in our view, the rejection of mercy petition does give rise to a cause of action at Delhi," it said.
The bench also said, "The material to be examined is the advice tendered by the cabinet and all the documents and records pertaining to the same are in Delhi and the decision has also been taken in Delhi.
More From This Section
The court also rejected the state government's argument that cause of action was linked with crime, saying that "concept of cause of action in respect of criminal proceedings cannot apply sensu stricto (strict sense) to the present proceedings as the same are not a continuation of the judicial proceedings but premised upon executive orders".
It said that the act of the President of India under the constitutional power is entirely different from the judicial power and cannot be regarded as an extension of it.
petition of the convict, Sonu Sardar, who has sought that his death penalty be commuted to life imprisonment on account of delay in deciding his mercy plea as well as for allegedly keeping him in "solitary confinement illegally".
The Delhi High Court had on March 2, 2015 stayed the execution of Sardar after which the state government had approached the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court's jurisdiction to hear the matter. The apex court had asked the high court to decide the state's application in four weeks.
Sardar, along with his brother and accomplices, had killed five persons of a family, including a woman and two children, during a dacoity bid in Chhattisgarh's Cher village on November 26, 2004. The trial court had slapped death penalty on him and the Chhattisgarh High Court had upheld it.