The court observed that a young unmarried woman will not put her reputation in peril by alleging falsely about forcible sexual assault.
"Theincreasingtrendofcrimesagainstwomencanbe arrested onlyoncesocietyrealisesthatany formof deviance againstwomen would not be toleratedandmoreso in extreme casesof brutalitysuchasthepresentone.
"Hence the criminaljusticesystem mustinstillconfidence inthe minds ofpeople, especiallywomen," Additional Sessions Judge Sanjiv Jain said in a 55-page order.
"These are the times when gruesome crimes against women have becomerampantandcourtscannotturnablindeyetothe need tosendastrongdeterrentmessagetotheperpetratorsof such crimes. Such offences require exemplary punishment," the court said.
Also Read
According to the prosecution, a complaint was lodged on May 19, 2012 thatthe woman wasrapedbysixpersonsin a vehicle nearKalindiKunj in south-east Delhi.
The court said that the role of a judge is tocull out true facts fromthe evidenceledbeforehimand"ensure that guiltydoesnotgoscotfreeand innocent'slifeandliberty is notjeopardised."
It relied on victim's testimony and rejected contention of defence counsel that there were contradictions in her evidence saying, "Apersonwithso much trauma cannot beexpectedto remembereverysceneanddepose inaparrot-likemanner."
The police said accused Vicky, Lucky, Yasin and Satyajeet had abductedthewomanandtookherto an isolated place where these four along with UmaShankerandAmitgangraped her.
Vicky also committed unnatural sex with her and threatened to kill her, it said.
All the accused had denied the allegations and claimed they were falsely implicated.
The court said it must be sensitive and responsive to the
plight of the female victim of sexual assault.
"Society's belief and value systems need to be kept uppermost in mind as rape is the worst form of woman's oppression. A forcible sexual assault brings in humiliation, feeling of disgust, tremendous embarrassment, sense of shame, trauma and lifelong emotional scar to a victim," it said.
"We must realize that a woman suffers a tremendous sense of shame and the fear of being shunned by society. Instead of treating her with compassion and understanding, as one who is injured victim of a crime, she is, more often that not,treated as a sinner and shunned," it said.
The court, while sentencing the convicts, refused to take a lenient view towards them saying, itis truethatconvicts areyoungandhave a family to supportbuton theotherhand wemustseetheplightof the woman,whowas forcedtoillicit intercourse,whichisconsideredtobeamong"the most morally andphysically,reprehensiblecrimeinthesociety."
"Shewasundersomuchtraumaandpainthatafterthe incident, sheremainedhospitalisedforalong time as she had receivedmultipleinjuries," it said.
The court, while sending the convicts to jail,also imposed varied fines.
Vicky, who was awarded 12 years in jail, was also slapped a fine of Rs 70,000. Lucky, Yasin and Satyajeet, who were awarded 10 years in jail for offences of gangrape and kidnapping, were directed to pay Rs 40,000 fine while Amit and Uma Shanker were asked to pay Rs 25,000 fine.
The court, which directed that the total fine be paid to the victim, also ordered the District Legal Service Authority to adequately compensate the woman under victim compensation scheme.