The high court also clarified that in its interim order on January 9, it had directed the CBI not to interrogate the present chairman or any other sitting member of the UPPSC who are petitioners and that there was no bar on quizzing any former president or member.
During the course of the hearing, the central and state governments filed their respective counter-affidavits, after which the court granted time to the UPPSC to file rejoinder affidavit by the next date of hearing, February 6.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice D B Bhosale and Justice Suneet Kumar was hearing a writ petition filed by the UPPSC through its chairman Anirudh Singh Yadav and members.
Earlier, on January 2, 2018, the court had directed the counsel for the state government to apprise the court as to on what basis the state government has recommended to the central government for the CBI inquiry.
It has been alleged in the petition that as the UPPSC is a constitutional body, the central government notification directing the CBI inquiry into its affairs was "illegal and without any jurisdiction".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content