The complaint was filed by VE Commercial Vehicles Ltd -- a joint venture between Eicher Motors India and Sweden's Volvo Group.
This is the second time that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has dismissed a complaint filed by VE Commercial Vehicles against the UPSRTC.
Among others, it was alleged that there existed a tacit anti-competitive agreement among Tata Motors Ltd (TML), Ashok Leyland Ltd (ALL) and the UPSRTC in violation of Section 3 of the Competition Act.
For the present case, the regulator considered the "market for procurement of bus chassis in India" as the relevant one.
Also Read
It was also alleged that the UPSRTC had abused its dominant position and violated Section 4 of the Act by granting favourable terms and conditions for TML and ALL in the tenders floated.
Section 4 pertains to abuse of dominant market position.
In an order dated September 7, the watchdog said the UPSRTC does not seem to enjoy a position of strength in the relevant market.
"In the absence of dominance in the relevant market, assessment of abuse of dominant position is not required under the provisions of Section 4 of the Act," the regulator added.
The order was passed by five members of the CCI, including chairman D K Sikri.
In a supplementary order, CCI member Augustine Peter said if the UPSRTC had the intention to favour TML and ALL, it could have couched the conditions in such a manner as to exclude all the new players from the bid, but that was not the case.
"As part of the Vendor Development Programme, new and less experienced players are allowed to participate though some additional conditions have been imposed on them based on business justification," he said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content