The complaint was also filed against ACE Educational Services, ACE Engineering Education, ACE Engineering Publications, ACE Educational Academy, Yadala Satyanarayana Memorial Educational Society, ACE Engineering Academy as well as Y V Gopala Krishna Murthy -- who controls all the six entities.
All of them are based in Andhra Pradesh.
For the case, Competition Commission of India (CCI) considered 'provision of coaching services related to GATE, ESE and State Engineering Services Exam in India' as the relevant market.
Among others, it was alleged that after taking the informant's services, payment was delayed.
Also Read
Rejecting the complaint, CCI said opposite parties "do not appear to be dominant" in the relevant market.
In the absence of dominance, their conduct is not required to be assessed for alleged violation of Section 4 of the Competition Act, it added.
Section 4 of the Competition Act pertains to abuse of dominant position.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content