"This reference is of fundamental importance. It is important for Union of India to explain why reference has been made by it. We want to know what we have to answer," senior advocate Rajeev Dhawan told a five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice A R Dave.
Appearing for Punjab government, Dhawan told the bench, conducting a hearing on the Presidential Reference pertaining to Punjab Termination of Agreements Act, 2004, that "this case has come from Centre and not from Haryana. We would like to see the views of Union."
At the outset, senior advocate Ram Jethmalani, also on behalf of Punjab, said the bench should consider preliminary objections raised and the hearing on Haryana's applications on which interim order has been passed.
He said the interim order passed by the apex court has been complied with by Punjab.
Also Read
The bench, which also comprised Justices P C Ghose, Shiva Kirti Singh, A K Goel and Amitava Roy, agreed with Jethmalani and said he could share with the parties the note on the preliminary objections.
Presidential Reference that "the Centre will not take any side".
On the same day, Punjab Assembly had passed the bill against construction of the contentious SYL canal providing for transfer of proprietary rights back to the land owners free of cost.
Three days later, the apex court had directed maintenance of status quo on land meant for SYL canal, after Haryana alleged that attempts have been made to alter its use by levelling it.
The apex court in its interim order had also appointed Union Home Secretary and Punjab's Chief Secretary and Director General of Police as the 'joint receiver' of land and other property meant for the SYL canal till further order.