Maintaining that such a decision has in many cases led to the aluminium industry "cornering" the mines, the BPSL counsel said this was in contravention of the Coal Ordinance which states that core sectors -power, iron and steel and cement- needed to be protected and aluminium was not in this sector.
BPSL and Monet Ispat and Energy Ltd also challenged the two-round financial bidding process under the ongoing coal auction, saying such a method was "arbitrary and irrational" as the Ordinance and the Rules under it did not provide for such a procedure.
The court after hearing the brief arguments listed the matter for directions tomorrow.
During the hearing, Sibal argued that change of end-use from steel to non-regulated sector was contrary to the provisions of the ordinance.
He also argued that as a result, majority of coal blocks "have been cornered" by aluminium companies like Hindalco Industries Ltd and Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd.
"But they have bid very high for these blocks," the bench responded, to which Sibal said "the Ordinance does not say end-use is revenue".
