The Commission asked the department "to make necessary changes to the practice of ACR preparation, in view of the fact that power to write ACR in the hands of superiors has become a tool of harassment and denial of crucial information like ACR" to one for personal vendetta.
This "will compel the sub-ordinates to please the superiors at the cost of good governance practices for reasons of promotion, which is nothing but a form of corruption", Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said.
The principal of the school claimed, during the hearing, that unless Sunanda fills in the Annual Performance Assessment Report (APAR), it was not possible to furnish ACR to her.
It also came to light that there were hostilities between Sunanda and the officials of the Education Department who had allegedly threatened her with negative ACR.
The Commission sought to know from the Education Department what alternative in the absence of ACR for the relevant period was made available to her.