Special Judge Virender Kumar Goyal also convicted three retired public servants -- Jayashree Dattatray Rahate, Deepak Natvarlal Shah and Lalitha Lakshmanan -- for helping Rajan to obtain a fake passport by "entering into a criminal conspiracy".
Moments after the verdict was announced and the court ordered the police to take them in immediate custody, the three public servants, who were present in the courtroom, broke down. The three of them were so far out on bail.
All the four were convicted of the same offences for which the punishment ranges from seven years to life term.
They were convicted of cheating, using as genuine a forged document, forgery for the purpose of cheating, forgery of valuable security or will, cheating by impersonation and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code and violating relevant provisions of the Passport Act.
Also Read
It said that signatures appearing in the application form for re-issue of passport given at RPO, Bangalore and on the passport issued by Consulate General of India, Sydney, Australia, on the basis of the same particulars, were the same and tallied with the specimen signatures of Rajan.
"In view of the above, it has been proved beyond reasonable doubt that all the accused persons entered into a criminal conspiracy to do an illegal act by illegal means and in consequence of the same, accused Rajan applied for re-issue of passport at RPO, Bangalore with false particulars supported with the forged and fabricated documents and the accused public servants accepted and proceeded the said application and issued passport in the name of Mohan Kumar, i.E. Rajan," the court said.
"All accused had entered into a criminal conspiracy to do an illegal act by illegal means. Accused Rajan intentionally and knowingly furnished false information with false address and other particulars whereas in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy," it said.
The court found that Rajan's application for passport was accepted by Lakshmanan and processed by Rahate, where his date of birth was corrected as the old passport copy of was also forged and fabricated.
The court had on March 28 reserved its judgement in the case.
Lakshmanan had earlier approached the high court to transfer to Bangalore her trial, but the petition was rejected on January 9 on the ground that a district court here could also hear the matter.
During pendency of the plea, the high court had ordered a stay on pronouncement of verdict in the case by trial court. However, the high court later rejected the plea.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content