Arguing before the division bench of Justices Harsha Dewani and Sonia Gokani, Chidambaram argued that Gujarat government had no jurisdiction to seek sales tax from his client, as its delivery point is 32 nautical miles away from Hazira port, Surat and not in the territory of Gujarat state.
He further argued that the company is a contractor and the sales tax can be levied on Gas Authority of India Limited (GAIL).
The gas was taken to Hazira, where after conducting the gas sweetening process, it was sold to GAIL.
The state has now demanded Rs 1,500 crore in sales tax dues for 1997 to 2001 period from the three companies, on the ground that they sold gas to GAIL inside Gujarat.
All three have challenged the tax levy.
You’ve hit your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online
Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app