The Commission also awarded a compensation of Rs 15,000 for the RTI applicant who was not given information about the crucial project in a timely manner on the excuse of "files not being traceable" in the ministry.
"The repeated answer of 'files not traceable' is reflecting disorganisation, and it is not acceptable in an RTI regime. There is no point in reiterating the same without implementing the direction of the First Appellate Authority," Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said.
"The public authority has to own the responsibility for this kind of disorganisation of files. The complainant was kept waiting in bewildered belief that wildlife files would be traced as promised. But it was an endless wait for him even after he approached the CIC in second appeal," he said.
Acharyulu said the core function of the department is to conserve forest, secure wildlife and also preserve the files regarding those functions.
Terming it is a "peculiar situation" when department had ordered disclosure of information which was still not provided to applicant D Suresh Kumar, the Commissioner said the appellant is compelled to come in second appeal because of its non-implementation besides not informing about the possibility of its implementation.