Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

CIL decision to cancel coal won by JPL comes under HC lens

A bench of justices observed 'this was not how the govt should function'

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 25 2015 | 8:12 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today asked Coal India Ltd (CIL) how it was offering coal from two Chhattisgarh mines to NTPC when it had cited production issues to cancel an e-auction of 49,000 metric tonnes (MT) of the mineral, mined from the same area, which was won by JPL.

A bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva observed "this was not how the government should function" and asked CIL to come with instructions on the issue tomorrow.

Jindal Power Ltd (JPL), in an affidavit, has contended that while the 49,000 MT of non-coking coal won by it was cancelled citing production issues at Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3 mines, 2.5 lakh tonne per month of coal from same area was being offered to National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd (NTPC) on 'as is where is basis'.

JPL said that much coal was being offered to NTPC for the PSU's thermal power plant at Barh in Patna, Bihar and to transport this the state-run enterprise had invited bids.

The company contended that it had participated in the e-auction held on April 11 and had bid the highest price of Rs 1008 per tonne of coal and had paid Rs 7.8 crore for the 49,000 MT coal won by it.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for JPL, said that on May 22 it was informed by CIL that the e-auction was being cancelled owing to production issues and the amount of Rs 7.8 crore was refunded.

He said CIL had on April 3 invited bids for 4.05 lakh tonne of non-coking coal and 1.5 lakh tonne of coking coal.

Of the 4.05 lakh tonne of non-coking coal, 60,000 metric tonne was to be auctioned from the two Gare Palma mines, JPL has said in the affidavit filed by it.

The affidavit was filed in the company's plea for quashing of March 20 order of the government cancelling the bids of the company and Bharat Aluminium Company (Balco) for four coal blocks amid speculation of cartelisation. Balco too has challenged the order separately.

Also Read

First Published: May 25 2015 | 7:22 PM IST

Next Story