The Muslim organisation told the apex court that Section 6A was enacted in view of a policy decision taken by the Centre by signing the Assam Accord which was a settlement arrived at after consultation and concurrence of all the stakeholders, including Assam and the agitators.
It said the provision intended to give a "quietus" to the issue of foreigners in Assam and restore peace and normalcy in the state resulting in conferment of citizenship right to lakhs of people.
"Such a verdict would also have ramifications on the international obligations of India, such as the one stipulated in Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights," JUH said in its 36-page written submissions submitted to a five-judge bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur.
The submissions were made in response to issues framed by apex court which is examining the constitutional validity of various aspects of a provision of the Citizenship Act 1955, including the cut-off date for awarding citizenship to Bangladeshi immigrants in Assam.
The apex court had asked the Centre and other parties concerned, including the Assam government, to file their written submissions in the matter by May 1 and fixed the matter for hearing on May 8.