The draft rules that seek to modify some provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Central Rules, 1971, were notified on March 30 by the Labour Ministry for seeking comments of stakeholders within a months' time to formalise it.
"At this juncture, the move by the Ministry is not at all a welcome one since it seeks to confuse as well as permanently sideline the major issue, pertaining to contract labour, being jointly raised by the entire trade union movement," CITU said in a statement.
Moreover, it is surprising as to how the Ministry could conceive keeping certain gross inconsistency/anomaly in the proposal. At present, in most of the states and establishments, statutory minimum wage payable also to regular workers ranges from Rs 5,500 to Rs 8,000.
"Will it be possible either by the state governments or central government to create a situation where contract workers are getting minimum Rs 10,000 as per the proposed change and the regular workers in the same establishment are getting less than that? Such inconsistency or anomaly if allowed to remain will become a plea for the employers not to implement the same. Is that the intention for the whole exercise?" CITU questioned.
"Seventh Pay Commission also made similar recommendation. This is as per the formula decided by the Indian Labour Conference supplemented by the Supreme Court Judgement in Raptakkos Brett case. This formula must be made a part of the Minimum Wages Act and this Act should be amended accordingly instead of pursuing the Wage Code Bill," it added.
CITU insisted that the changes as proposed above should be incorporated in the body of the main Act, i.E., the Contract Labour (Regulation & Abolition) Act 1970, through appropriate amendment and not with regards, in the Central Rules alone, if the intention is get the benefits of proposed change delivered to the contract workers and not just a pious declaration for public consumption only.