The California-based firm was slapped with a class action lawsuit for alleged violations of federal securities laws. The suit alleged that the company failed to disclose that Murthy was involved in an "improper relationship with a subordinate employee" in violation of iGates' stated policies.
It also said "Murthy's improper conduct created a risk that he would be terminated from the company jeopardising the company's future success".
"On August 22, 2013, the class action lawsuit filed against iGate and its former CEO, Phaneesh Murthy by a shareholder of iGate on June 14, 2013 in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, was voluntarily dismissed by the shareholder plaintiff, without prejudice," iGate said in a statement.
The statement further said: "No payment or consideration of any kind was made by any of the defendants in connection with the dismissal."
Also Read
The suit was filed against the firm and some of its officers and directors to recover damages from the company. The suit alleged violations of the federal securities laws pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
The suit was filed by a New York-Based law firm, Pomerantz Grossman Hufford Dahlstrom & Gross LLP, on behalf of persons or entities who purchased or acquired securities of iGate between March 14, 2012 and May 21, 2013.