The tug of war between the BCCI office bearers and the CoA today took an ugly turn after the Vinod Rai-led committee issued a directive to stop the June 22 Special General Meeting of the affiliated units, to the dismay of the the Board's senior officials.
The old guard of BCCI along with current office bearers are in no mood to budge from their stand and they feel the meeting will be held as per schedule.
However, the CoA has asked the BCCI employees to refrain from entertaining any invoices (bills) raised by the state unit officials with regards to the SGM.
The CoA deemed the meeting illegal as no permission have been sought as per a March 15 guidelines, which required prior permission from the Supreme Court-appointed committee to conduct a SGM.
While the sparring has been on for some time between the two parties, what has irked the office-bearers is the tone of the letter where they have used the tactic of stopping the TA/DA and flight reimbursement of the members for the meeting.
"The approval of the CoA has neither been sought nor provided in relation to the SGM to be held on 22nd June, 2018," the CoA wrote in its email to the employees.
"Till further instructions from the CoA, it is directed that no BCCI employee/consultant/retainer/service provider shall prepare and - or - circulate any papers in respect of the said SGM or in any way Act further to or in aid of the notice (including without limitation incurring any cost or expenses towards the said SGM by way of bookies etc," it added.
More From This Section
The meeting was summoned after more than 15 units wrote to acting president CK Khanna for a SGM. Khanna, in turn, wrote to acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary asking him to issue a notice for SGM as per the mandated three-week time.
A senior BCCI official said that CoA does not have the authority to forcibly stop the SGM as it's the right of the members.
"If the issue of communication is without having the authority to issue one, the communication cannot have any force," a senior official told PTI.
The senior official, who is conversant with judicial process, then went onto explain what he meant.
"For example, the COA cannot issue a communication directing the arrest of an individual. If they issue such a communication, the communication will definitely exist but it shall be without any force. The rules and regulations of the BCCI or the BCCI itself have not been extinguished," he added.
He even termed the CoA's attempt to stop the SGM "contempt of court".
"A requisitioned (SGM) meeting is mandatory and any attempt to derail the same may tantamount to violation of the law and possibly contempt of court. This communication appears to depict animosity towards and bias against the very organization which the COA has been mandated with supervision of its administration."