The court's observations came while hearing pleas of six persons, who were named as accused in CBI's FIR but not chargesheeted in a case pertaining to alleged irregularities in allocation of Rajhara North coal block in Jharkhand to accused firm Vini Iron and Steel Udyog Ltd (VISUL).
The court also issued notices to Chief Passport Officer of the Ministry of External Affairs and Regional Passport Officer of Ranchi to clarify on the issue.
Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar said, "...It has also been observed that passport officer also continues to sit over the matter and does not prefer any action under the Passport Act whether to impound it or to release it and as a routine asked for court orders."
"It simply amounts to passing the buck on the part of the passport officer towards the court instead of performing their own duty under the Passport Act," the court observed and fixed the matter for further hearing on April 30.
Also Read
The judge also noted that earlier it was observed that during the probe, passports of certain accused were seized by CBI but they were not sent to the passport officer for months.
"...Once they (passports) are sent then upon completion of investigation, CBI does not prefer to intimate the concerned passport officer whether those persons whose passport were sent to them have been chargesheeted or not by them or whether their passport are required by them or not," it said.