The visitors' log book, which was lying in sealed cover with another bench hearing 2G cases, be given to the panel headed by former special director CBI M L Sharma who will have to share the contents with other probe team members only and file a report in the court within 12 weeks, a three-judge bench headed by Justice M B Lokur said.
Senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for the former CBI Director, reiterated his stand that the alleged meetings alone cannot "per se" be termed objectionable as the real test would be whether those meetings led to according of favours to any named accused or other persons.
The bench, meanwhile, did not pass any order on the plea seeking a direction to the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) that the panel be given documents of those cases where the CVC did not favour prosecution.
Also Read
Initially, it was said that the panel will have access of all requisite documents, Prashant Bhushan, appearing for NGO Common Cause, said.
"At the moment, he (Sharma) does not have the (visitors) register, the primary document," the bench said.
Ordering the probe, the bench had then said that there
cannot at all be any justification for Sinha to meet any accused in a criminal case where "investigation is underway, without the investigating officer being present".
The bench then appointed a panel headed by Sharma who later sought the visitors' diary for proceeding with the probe.
As the visitors' diary was sealed by an order of a bench, hearing 2G cases, the three-judge bench, which hears the coal scam matters, said it would be appropriate that the CJI-headed bench decides whether the Sharma panel can be given the sealed diary or not.
Sharma was appointed by the apex court to probe whether the meetings of Ranjit Sinha with the accused in coal block allocation scam had impacted the probe or their final outcome.
It had on September 14 allowed Sharma to access whatever records he felt necessary for the purposes of inquiry.
After court's directions, Sharma had asked the CVC to make available to him its comments on the CBI's probe in each of the 254 coal blocks allocation.
He had also urged the CVC to provide him the correspondence that might have been exchanged between it and the CBI on the subject.