Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar said the court has to take into account the nature of offence whether it is grave and severe or not while deciding the pleas for exemption.
"It would be appropriate to clarify that once a person is arrayed as an accused, he cannot enjoy the liberty given by the Constitution to a common man. After being an accused, certain restrictions comes into operation," the judge said.
The court further added that the status of an accused person before the court of law should be irrespective of their status in the society and one cannot say that a particular accused is on a better footing than others.
"In these circumstances, when the exemption applications have been inveriably allowed, so it will be in the interest of justice if the application seeking permanent exemption ought not to be allowed in order to ensure smooth trial in the case.
Also Read
"Moreover, probably this court can mention from its experience in other coal scam cases that an accused who can engage a battery of senior lawyers seek exemption through other advocates....And the court is made to wait for other counsel," it said.
The court also accepted the contention of CBI which has opposed the Jindal's plea that "presence of an accused is a rule and absence an exception.