The Air Cargo Agents Association of India had moved the COMPAT after the Competition Commission ruled against its injunction application opposing the accounts settlement system, indicating it was not compulsory for agents.
Though the International Air Transport Association (IATA) had maintained that the pilot project was not binding on cargo agents, they had expressed the apprehension that they would "suffer" if the accounts settlement system was made compulsory at a later stage.
Maintaining that the accounts settlement system was voluntary for airlines and cargo agents, the counsels for Air Cargo Agents Association of India and IATA pointed out before the tribunal that the accounts settlement system was voluntary and cargo agents, who wanted to deal with airlines outside this system, were free to do so.
Cargo agents counsel did not press the appeal and sought to withdraw it with the liberty to approach COMPAT in case it became necessary. Following this, the COMPAT disposed of the appeal.
"In order to derive maximum economic benefits from the anticipated traffic growth, the Indian air cargo community needs to modernise its processes and enhance its efficiencies. CASS (the cargo accounts settlement system) is a tool available for airlines and cargo agents," IATA had said in an earlier statement.
It had also claimed that since the launch of the CASS India Pilot in May 2013, "there has been an increase in the number of participating cargo agents, with more airlines and agents expressing active interest to participate".