At least two other orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) related to Coal India where the former did not impose any penalty have also been set aside.
The orders have been quashed on the ground that the regulator did not follow the principles of natural justice while hearing the parties concerned.
Finding the state-owned miner violating fair trade norms with regard to fuel supply pacts, CCI had penalised the company in December 2013. Following an appeal by Coal India, the tribunal had stayed implementation of the regulator's order in February 2014.
Apart from Coal India, the appellants were Mahanadi Coalfields, Western Coalfields and South Eastern Coalfields.
Also Read
In another case, along with Coal India, there were seven other appellants, including South Eastern Coalfields, Bharat Coking Coal and Central Coalfields.
The tribunal said the impugned orders are set aside and the matters be remitted to the Commission for deciding the issues arising out of the information filed by Maharashtra State Power Generation Company, Gujarat State Electricity Corporation, Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Corporation, West Bengal Power Development Corporation, Sponge Iron Manufacturers Association and GHCL afresh.
The penalty of Rs 1,773 crore was also the first major one by CCI on a state-owned entity.
In a statement, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co said the tribunal has set aside the CCI order imposing a fine on Coal India, as well as two related orders, and has remitted the matters back to the regulator for fresh consideration.
SAM & Co acted as the legal advisor to Coal India and its subsidiaries on the matter.
Generating Company and Gujarat State Electricity Corporation, CCI had imposed Rs 1,773 crore on Coal India for abusing its dominant position by imposing unfair and discriminatory conditions in its fuel supply agreements.
"CCI then passed subsequent orders in cases filed by the West Bengal Power Development Corporation, Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company, Sponge Iron Manufacturers' Association, and Gujarat Heavy Chemicals, which did not impose a further penalty but required Coal India to cease and desist from its unfair conduct and modify the terms of its agreements," SAM & Co said in the statement.
The tribunal also made it clear that "neither of the parties shall be entitled to adduce any additional evidence before the Commission nor Coal India and its subsidiaries shall be allowed to withdraw the amendments / modifications made in the fuel supply agreements or concessions granted during the pendency of the cases before the Commission".
While penalising Coal India in December 2013, CCI had said it was operating independently of market forces and enjoys an undisputed dominance in the country over production and supply of non-coking coal.
Coal India abused its dominance and did not try to evolve / draft / finalise terms and conditions of FSAs (Fuel Supply Agreements) through a bilateral process with procurers, the watchdog had said.