Lashing out at Modi, senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said that the Prime Minister "failed" to mention that his own government's "inexplicable" decision of not including any provisions for respecting the rights of forest dwellers led to failure of the passage of the Bill in the Upper House.
Ramesh said that it is upto the government to explain why it is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are "not misused".
The Lok Sabha during the recently concluded session had passed the CAF Bill which aims to pave the way for "unlocking" of nearly Rs 41,000 crore earmarked for forest land which is lying unspent for about four years.
"It is for the Prime Minister to explain why his government is so keen on transferring thousands of crores to forest bureaucrats without any measures to ensure that these funds are not misused and that the rights of our country's poorest people are protected," Ramesh said.
Noting that the amendments were also supported by CPM, JD(U) and TMC, Ramesh said that this was done at a time when plantation activities of forest authorities are resulting in conflicts across the country.
"When the opposition gave notice for amendments to this effect, the government could have accepted them; but instead of doing so, the government chose to defer the Bill.
The bill aims at ensuring expeditious utilisation of
accumulated unspent amounts available with the ad hoc Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) which is presently around Rs 41,000 crore.
"The reasons why this amendment is required are threefold - experiences and likely problems that will occur in implementation, the legal provisions of the Forest Rights Act itself and principles of law that require such provisions to be placed in the statute and not in the rules," he said.
Noting that all office bearers in the institutions under the Bill are forest officials, Ramesh said that it is clear that the proposed structure will be entirely dominated by forest officials which will lead to conflicts.
"They may also harm local ecosystems that forest dwellers depend on. This has led to frequent conflict and deprivation of rights. Violent conflicts due to forest dwellers being evicted by forest departments from lands being cultivated by them for plantations have been reported from Chhattisgarh, Telengana, Jharkhand and other states.
"It is not our argument and it is not the purpose of the proposed amendment to prevent these funds from being spent. The question is - should this spending be completely in the hands of corrupt forest bureaucrats who have a track record of depriving people of their rights? Or should there be at least minimal safeguards to protect legal rights under the FRA?," he said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories
Over 30 subscriber-only stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app