Don’t miss the latest developments in business and finance.

Contradiction in ED's charge sheet in 2G's PMLA case: Balwa

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 04 2014 | 7:09 PM IST
Swan Telecom promoter Shahid Usman Balwa today told a Delhi court that the charge sheet filed by Enforcement Directorate in a 2G scam-related money laundering case was "contradictory" and the transfer of Rs 200 crore to Kalaignar TV was a "prudent business transaction".
Balwa, who has been chargesheeted in the case along with 18 others, including former Telecom Minister A Raja and DMK MP Kanimozhi, argued in the court that ED has made the case on the basis of "hearsay evidence" and its complaint was nothing but a "bundle or compilation of statements and documents."
Advocate Vijay Aggarwal, who argued for Shahid Balwa and Directors of Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt Ltd Asif Balwa and Rajiv Aggarwal, who are also accused in the case, claimed that facts stated in ED's charge sheet do not have any legal standing.
"On one side, ED has said they have done separate probe and on the other they are relying on CBI's FIR as well as the charge sheet filed earlier. ED's complaint is contradictory," he told Special CBI Judge O P Saini while arguing on framing of charges as well as bail pleas of the accused.
ED had filed a charge sheet against 19 accused claiming that the transaction of Rs 200 crore, which was allegedly paid to Kalaignar TV, was not genuine" and it was a "bribe for grant of telecom licences to DB Group companies".
During the arguments, Aggarwal claimed that ED has alleged that various entities were involved in transaction of money but the agency has not seized any document from the Registrar of Companies (RoC) and even no official from the RoC has been arraigned as witness in the case.
On ED's allegation that reverse trail of Rs 200 crore from DMK-run Kalaignar TV to DB group company commenced after Raja was summoned by CBI in December 2010 for interrogation in 2G scam case, Aggarwal said almost 50 per cent of the money given to the TV channel was refunded before it.
He also argued his clients were not involved in the transaction of money.

Also Read

First Published: Jun 04 2014 | 7:09 PM IST

Next Story