The court allowed the appeal of the man, who was denied interim custody of his 12-year-old son and nine-year-old daughter after they refused to live with him, saying they were not mature enough to decide whom to live with.
"They (children) are of a very tender age. They are not mature enough to form their own intelligent preference. In such a situation, if they are deprived of love and affection of both the parents, it will leave a permanent scar on their minds.
The court allowed him to meet his children, who are in the custody of their mother, twice a month.
"I am also of the opinion that visitation is imperative for the well-being of the children at this stage so that they are not deprived of the love and affection of both the parents," the judge said.
Also Read
In his appeal, the man only sought visiting rights and did not press for custody of the children.
In the domestic violence case lodged by the wife, it has been alleged that she got married to the accused in 2002 and had been living separately since 2015 after she was thrown out of the matrimonial home.
The woman had won the custody of her children on March 27 this year to keep them away from their father after claiming that the kids,especiallythegirl, had witnessedthe"cruel and torturous acts" oftheir father.
The court, however, allowed the man to meet his children as he wished to keep in touch so that they do not forget him.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content