Special Cell of Delhi Police told the court that there was circumstantial evidence against Tunda as 40 kg explosives were recovered from the house of his brother in Delhi, where he was also residing, and four other accused, who had faced the trial earlier in the case, had also given confessional statements that they had hatched the conspiracy for terror strikes here on the instructions of Tunda.
Advocate M S Khan, who appeared for 72-year-old Tunda, argued that the material relied upon by the police against his client was only the disclosure statements of these co-accused.
He said that there was no question of conspiracy as these co-accused were earlier acquitted of the offence of criminal conspiracy by the designated court.
"When other co-conspirators have been acquitted (of the charges of conspiracy) then how can I (Tunda) be linked with it," Khan said, adding that Tunda was not charged along with the accused who had given the confessional statements.
"I cannot file an appeal on the judgement. State should have gone in appeal. I cannot review the judgement (of the trial court)," the judge told the police and fixed the matter for further hearing on May 15.