Rejecting Bharti's plea, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Tarun Yogesh said that "without sanction of central or state government, no cognizance of offence can be taken against alleged erring police officials."
"In the present facts and circumstances filing of charge sheet by the investigating agency, any allegation of unfair or biased investigation cannot be separated from the discharge of official duty by IO. Therefore, protection of public servants under section 197 of IPC would come into play," the court said.
The court also dismissed the criminal defamation case filed by Bharti's counsel Deepak Khosla against the magistrate saying the "protection of judges and public servants as contemplated under section 197 CrPC comes into play."
"Protection of Judges and Public Servants as contemplated under section 197 CrPC hence comes into play and as such cognizance of alleged offence under section 499, 500 (defamation) of IPC cannot be taken without prior sanbcton of state or central government," the ACMM said.
On November 7, the court had reserved its order on the pleas moved by Bharti for registration of FIR against the police officials and his counsel's defamation case against the magistrate Niti Phutela.